Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36007670›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of infection control2023

Is it safe and effective to administer COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ishaque Hameed, Mohammad Omer Khan, Khushboo Nusrat, Samar Mahmood, Muhammad Nashit, Shanza Malik, Omer Mustafa Siddiqui, Syed Abdus Samad, Shayan Marsia, Muhammad Shariq Usman and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of infection control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Neonatal and maternal outcomes of mRNA versus Non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ishaque HameedDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohammad Omer KhanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Khushboo NusratDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Samar MahmoodDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad NashitDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shanza MalikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Omer Mustafa SiddiquiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed Abdus SamadDepartment of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shayan MarsiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: shayan.shoaib420@gmail.com.
Muhammad Shariq UsmanDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Tariq Jamal SiddiqiDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PKUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women performing an updated meta-analysis.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Central, and SCOPUS from inception to March 2022. Outcomes of interest were incidence of adverse maternal, fetal and neonatal consequences pertaining to safety of the vaccines. Secondarily, we analyzed the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalization for COVID-19, and admission to the I.C.U. for COVID-19 assessing the effectiveness of vaccines. Results were pooled using a random effects model.

resultsTen observational studies (n=326,499) analyzing pregnant women were included. Our results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination prevents infection (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.47, 0.67; P = <0.00001) and related hospitalizations (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.82; P = 0.006) effectively. It was also observed that vaccination does not change adverse outcomes in pregnancy, namely preeclampsia or eclampsia, stroke (four weeks of delivery), meconium-stained amniotic fluid, spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and blood transfusions. Furthermore, the vaccine was observed to be protective against neonatal COVID-19 I.C.U. admissions (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81, 0.90; P = <0.00001).

conclusionOur pooled analysis suggests that the COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women prevents infection effectively and has no adverse outcomes. Future large-scale trials in a randomized fashion are needed to confirm our results.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesAdverse outcomesCOVID-19EfficacyPregnancySafetyVaccines

Identifiers

PMID36007670
PMCPMC9394101
OpenAlexW4292974394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.