Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36007527›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Neural signatures of evidence accumulation in temporal decisions.

Nir Ofir, Ayelet N Landau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neural Signatures of Flexible Multiple Timing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Motor Preparation Tracks Decision Boundary Crossing Rather Than Accumulated Evidence in Temporal Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robust inference of causality in high-dimensional dynamical processes from the Information Imbalance of distance ranks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neurocomputational Models of Interval Timing: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nir OfirDepartment of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel; Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel; Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel. Electronic address: nir.ofir@mail.huji.ac.il.
Ayelet N LandauDepartment of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel; Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel. Electronic address: ayelet.landau@mail.huji.ac.il.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive models of interval timing can be formulated as an accumulation-to-bound process.

Indexed as

Decision MakingElectroencephalographyHumansCPPdecision makingdrift-diffusion modelsEEGevidence accumulationinterval timingP300temporal bisectiontime perception

Identifiers

PMID36007527
OpenAlexW4293212762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.