Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36007481›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of surgical research2022

Text Messaging, Telephone, or In-Person Outpatient Visit to the Surgical Clinic: A Randomized Trial.

Areeg Khair, Paul M Cromwell, Asila Abdelatif, Fiona Boland, Colum O'Reilly, Nadiim Maudarbaccus, Muyiwa Aremu, Mayilone Arumugasamy, Tom N Walsh

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of surgical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Areeg KhairDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul M CromwellDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: paulcromwell@rcsi.ie.
Asila AbdelatifDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Fiona BolandRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Colum O'ReillyDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Nadiim MaudarbaccusDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Muyiwa AremuDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Mayilone ArumugasamyDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Tom N WalshDepartment of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRoutine outpatient follow-up visits for surgical patients are a source of strain on health-care resources and patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic adding a new urgency to finding the safest follow-up arrangement, text message follow-up might prove an acceptable alternative to a phone call or an in-person clinic visit.

methodsAn open-label, three-arm, parallel randomized trial was conducted. The interventions were traditional in-person appointment, a telephone call, or a text message. The primary outcome was the number of postdischarge complications identified. The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction with follow-up, future preference, default to follow-up, and preference to receiving medical information by text message.

resultsTwo hundred eight patients underwent randomization: 50 in the in-person group, 80 in the telephone group, and 78 in the text message group. There was no difference in the number of reported complications: 5 (10%) patients in the in-person group, 7 (9%) patients in the text group, and 11 (14%) patients in the telephone group (P = 0.613). The preferred method of follow-up was by telephone (106, 61.6%). The least preferred was the in-person follow-up (15, 8.7%, P = 0.002), which also had the highest default rate (44%).

conclusionsThere was no evidence that text messages and telephone calls are unsafe and ineffective methods of follow-up. Although most patients are happy to receive results by text message, the majority of patients would prefer a telephone follow-up and are less likely to default by this method. Health-care systems should develop telehealth initiatives when planning health-care services in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Text MessagingAftercareHumansOutpatientsPandemicsPatient DischargeTelephoneGeneral surgeryPatient satisfactionQuality improvementTelemedicineText messaging

Identifiers

PMID36007481
PMCPMC9394432
OpenAlexW4292635831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.