Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36007449›Full record

SynthesisESMO open2022

Maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor in patients with newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: individual patient data and trial-level meta-analysis.

S Gulia, S Kannan, J Ghosh, S Rath, A Maheshwari, S Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Navigating cancer care in India: Reflections & imperatives.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Gynaecological Oncology in India: Past, Present and Future.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S GuliaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
S KannanHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Biostatistics, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
J GhoshDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
S RathDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
A MaheshwariHomi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Gynecologic Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
S GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India. Electronic address: sudeepgupta04@yahoo.com.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe synthesize the efficacy and toxicity of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe manually extracted individual patient data (IPD) for progression-free survival (PFS) from published survival curves of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PARPi versus placebo as maintenance therapy in first-line treatment, for whole study populations and subgroups, based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation (germline and/or somatic) and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, using WebPlotDigitizer software. The respective PFS curves for each study and combined population were reconstructed from extracted IPD. The primary outcome was PFS in combined whole population and subgroups.

resultsIn IPD analysis of combined population from three RCTs, with 2296 patients and 1287 events, PFS was significantly longer in PARPi versus placebo [median 20.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 18.6-21.9) versus 14.9 (95% CI 13.9-16.5) months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.60-0.75; P < 0.001]. In IPD subgroup analyses from four eligible RCTs (2687 patients and 1485 events), median PFS was significantly longer in PARPi versus placebo arm, in the BRCA-mutated (45.7 versus 17.7 months, respectively; HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32-0.46; P < 0.001), HRD-positive including BRCA-mutated (34.7 versus 17.9 months, respectively; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38-0.54; P < 0.001), and HRD positive excluding BRCA-mutated (22.3 versus 13.1 months, respectively; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.65; P < 0.001) subgroups, but not in the HRD-negative (15.0 versus 11.3 months, respectively; HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.05; P = 0.75) subgroup. Results of trial-level meta-analysis were concordant with IPD analysis in whole population and subgroups.

conclusionsAmong newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients, PARPi maintenance therapy significantly improves PFS in those with germline and/or somatic BRCA mutation and/or HRD-positive tumor but not in those with HRD-negative tumor.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProgression-Free SurvivalAntineoplastic AgentsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitorsepithelial ovarian cancerfirst-linemeta-analysisPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36007449
PMCPMC9588903
OpenAlexW4292672264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.