ArticleAIDS care2023
Age, cognitive status, and accuracy of ADL self-reports in adults living with HIV.
Article in AIDS care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Determination of functional capacity in cognitively impaired persons living with HIV (PLHIV) is pivotal to the accurate diagnosis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Functional data is typically collected through self-report. Reliability concerns arise with memory and executive functioning impairments, which could compromise the integrity of self-report and result in inaccurate HAND diagnoses. The current study tested the accuracy of older PLHIV functional reports through examination of concordance rates between self-report and caregiver's (CG) report. Cross-sectional cognitive, mood, and functional status data were sampled from the Manhattan HIV Brain Bank. Participants and caregivers independently completed an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire, producing 78 participant-caregiver dyads. Functional report concordance was operationalized by calculating differences between participant and CG ADL total scores. Assessment pairs differing by 2 or more points were considered to be discordant. Analyses revealed that one-third of the patient sample was discordant in the ADL report. ANOVA revealed that PLHIV overestimating their functional impairments, were significantly older, more educated, and more depressed than other participants. Global cognitive functioning was not associated with concordance. Thus, the majority of PLHIV were consistent with their caregivers' ADL report, and older age and increased depressive symptomatology, but not cognitive status, were factors associated with discordance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.