Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006959›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Mitigation of noise-induced bias of PET radiomic features.

Ananthi Somasundaram, David Vállez García, Elisabeth Pfaehler, Joyce van Sluis, Rudi A J O Dierckx, Elisabeth G E de Vries, Ronald Boellaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ananthi SomasundaramDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8678-0188
David Vállez GarcíaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3308-3167
Elisabeth PfaehlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Juelich, Aachen, Germany.
Joyce van SluisDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rudi A J O DierckxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth G E de VriesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Medical Imaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne major challenge in PET radiomics is its sensitivity to noise. Low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) affects not only the precision but also the accuracy of quantitative metrics extracted from the images resulting in noise-induced bias. This phantom study aims to identify the radiomic features that are robust to noise in terms of precision and accuracy and to explore some methods that might help to correct noise-induced bias.

methodsA phantom containing three 18F-FDG filled 3D printed inserts, reflecting heterogeneous tracer uptake and realistic tumor shapes, was used in the study. The three different phantom inserts were filled and scanned with three different tumor-to-background ratios, simulating a total of nine different tumors. From the 40-minute list-mode data, ten frames each for 5 s, 10 s, 30 s, and 120 s frame duration were reconstructed to generate images with different noise levels. Under these noise conditions, the precision and accuracy of the radiomic features were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and similarity distance metric (SDM) respectively. Based on the ICC and SDM values, the radiomic features were categorized into four groups: poor, moderate, good, and excellent precision and accuracy. A "difference image" created by subtracting two statistically equivalent replicate images was used to develop a model to correct the noise-induced bias. Several regression methods (e.g., linear, exponential, sigmoid, and power-law) were tested. The best fitting model was chosen based on Akaike information criteria.

resultsSeveral radiomic features derived from low SNR images have high repeatability, with 68% of radiomic features having ICC ≥ 0.9 for images with a frame duration of 5 s. However, most features show a systematic bias that correlates with the increase in noise level. Out of 143 features with noise-induced bias, the SDM values were improved based on a regression model (53 features to excellent and 67 to good) indicating that the noise-induced bias of these features can be, at least partially, corrected.

conclusionTo have a predictive value, radiomic features should reflect tumor characteristics and be minimally affected by noise. The present study has shown that it is possible to correct for noise-induced bias, at least in a subset of the features, using a regression model based on the local image noise estimates.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Image Processing, Computer-AssistedBiasPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID36006959
PMCPMC9409510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.