ArticlePloS one2022
Relationships of sphenoid sinus pneumatization with internal carotid artery characteristics.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sphenoid sinus pneumatization types, extensions and adjacent neurovascular structures: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
- Anatomical variations of lamina papyracea, internal carotid artery, and optic canal dehiscence and protrusion: a computed tomography retrospective cohort study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Anatomical Features of the Sphenoid Sinus and Their Clinical Significance in Transsphenoidal Accesses to the Pituitary Gland and Parasellar Region: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional imaging anatomical study of the lateral opticocarotid recess and the accessory sphenoidal septum.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Automated Prediction of Sphenoid Sinus Pneumatization in Computed TomographyCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Clival Chordomas.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2025Review
- The trinity of the internal carotid artery: Unifying terminologies of the main classifications to improve its surgical understanding.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Anatomical Variants of Internal Carotid Artery-Results from a Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe explored the clinical significances of the relationships among sphenoid sinus aeration, intersphenoid sinus septum (ISS), and internal carotid artery (ICA).
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the preoperative paranasal sinus computed tomography scans and the medical charts of 490 patients who were treated by the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. We analyzed sphenoid sinus pneumatization, number of ISS, and positional relationships between the ICA and ISS (including ICA prominence and the thickness of surrounding bone).
resultsISS were often present in the ICAs of patients with presellar pneumatization (36.2%; p = 0.042). Sphenoid sinus pneumatization status significantly differed according to number of ISS (p < 0.001), ICA prominence (p < 0.001), ISS insertion into the ICA (p = 0.042), and distance from ISS to ICA (p = 0.004). When sphenoid sinus aeration was poor, the ICA was not prominent, and the ISS were attached to or lay close to the paraclival ICA.
conclusionsPatients with presellar pneumatization exhibited less prominent ICAs, and more ISS attached to or near the paraclival ICA, than did other patients. Therefore, particular caution is required when using the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to treat patients with poor sphenoid sinus aeration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.