Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006938›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Decellularized small intestine submucosa device for temporomandibular joint meniscus repair: Acute timepoint safety study.

William L Chung, Bryan N Brown, Alejandro J Almarza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William L ChungOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Bryan N BrownDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Alejandro J AlmarzaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4602-9258
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Michigan-Pittsburgh-Wyss Regenerative Medicine Resource Center: Advancing Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regeneration to Clinical Trial InitiationU24DE029462 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GIANNOBILE, WILLIAM V, KOHN, DAVID H. · 2020 to 2024
$31.3M
Michigan-Pittsburgh-Wyss Resource Center: Supporting Regenerative Medicine in Dental, Oral and Craniofacial TechnologiesU24DE026915 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GIANNOBILE, WILLIAM V, KOHN, DAVID H. · 2017 to 2019
$11.7M
NIDCR NIH HHS U24 DE026915NIDCR NIH HHS U24 DE029462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) Meniscus removal is an option for the patient to regain full range of motion if the disc is irreversibly damaged or unable to be reduced. However, this procedure leaves the joint vulnerable to condylar remodeling and degeneration. We have shown that extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds remodel into a tissue with near native TMJ meniscus in previous studies. The next step towards clinical translation is to manufacture the ECM scaffold as a device under good manufacturing practices (GMP) and test it in a pre-clinical animal study under good laboratory practices (GLP). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the in-vivo histopathological response to a Prototype GMP manufactured device made of decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS), by observing for signs of surrounding tissue reaction to the device that are indicative of an adverse host response in comparison to an empty control at 21 days post-surgical implantation in a canine TMJ meniscus removal and implant model in a GLP setting. The conclusive findings were that the ECM device is safe for placement in the TMJ. After 21 days post implantation, histology of tissue surrounding the device and draining lymph nodes showed that the Prototype GMP device had no negative effects compared to the empty site (as evaluated by the board-certified veterinary pathologist). Furthermore, there was a lack of negative findings for clinical pathology (hematology and clinical chemistry), mortality, and body weight/weight change. Future studies will go to one year after implantation to show that the remodel device remains as a viable tissue with near native mechanical properties.

Indexed as

MeniscusTemporomandibular Joint DiscAnimalsDogsExtracellular MatrixIntestine, SmallProstheses and ImplantsSwineTemporomandibular JointTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID36006938
PMCPMC9409591
OpenAlexW4293092935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.