Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

On the same page? A qualitative study protocol on collaboration in a multi-laboratory preclinical study.

Jenna M Evans, Alexander Peever, Agnes Grudniewicz, Braedon McDonald, Asher A Mendelson, Manoj M Lalu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jenna M EvansDeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-9889
Alexander PeeverDeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Agnes GrudniewiczTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Braedon McDonaldDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Snyder Institute for Chronic Diseases, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Asher A MendelsonRady Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Section of Critical Care Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-4752
Manoj M LaluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology and Regenerative Medicine Programs, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical advancements are slow to reach the patient bedside due to issues with knowledge translation from preclinical studies. Multi-laboratory preclinical studies are a promising strategy for addressing the methodological deficiencies that weaken the translational impact of single laboratory findings. However, multi-laboratory preclinical studies are rare and difficult, requiring strong collaboration to plan and execute a shared protocol. In multiteam systems such as these, collaboration is enhanced when members have cohesive ways of thinking about their goals and how to achieve them-that is, when they have "shared mental models". In this research project, we will examine how members of Canada's first multi-laboratory preclinical study build shared mental models and collaborate in the execution of their study.

methodsSix independent labs in Canada will conduct a preclinical study using a common protocol. To investigate mental models and collaboration in this multiteam system we will conduct a longitudinal qualitative study involving interviews at four time points, team observation, and document analysis. We will analyze interview transcripts using deductive coding to produce a matrix analysis of mental model content over time and inductive coding to produce a thematic analysis of members' experiences of collaboration over time. We will also triangulate data sources to "tell the story" of teamwork, capturing events and contextual information that explain changes in mental models and collaboration over time. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the most comprehensive longitudinal analyses of a real-world multiteam system, and the first within a preclinical laboratory setting. The results will contribute to our understanding of collaboration in multiteam systems, an organizational form increasingly used to tackle complex scientific and social problems. The results will also inform the implementation of future multi-laboratory preclinical studies, enhancing the likelihood of effective collaboration and improved 'bench to bedside' translation.

Indexed as

Research DesignCanadaHumansQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID36006928
PMCPMC9409520
OpenAlexW4293103389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.