Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006910›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Factor structure and psychometric properties of Polish version of Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) among adults and adolescents.

Zbigniew Wajda, Bernadetta Izydorczyk, Katarzyna Sitnik-Warchulska, Sebastian Lizińczyk, Jakub Lickiewicz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zbigniew WajdaFaculty of Management and Social Communication, Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5987-0145
Bernadetta IzydorczykFaculty of Philosophy, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna Sitnik-WarchulskaFaculty of Management and Social Communication, Institute of Applied Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Sebastian LizińczykFaculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice, Poland.
Jakub LickiewiczFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) by Parker et al., is a widely known and used tool in studies on the assessment of parenting behavior in adult, adolescent and child populations. This tool has had many translations and adaptations globally. In Poland, the factor structure and psychometric properties of PBI have not been studied so far. The aim of the presented research was to perform such an analysis both in the group of adults and adolescents. The data from four research projects, in which the 25-item version of the PBI translated into Polish was used, were analyzed. Data from 698 participants in total, including 473 adults and 225 adolescents were collected. Exploratory factor analyzes was performed for both mother and father version. A study of the reliability of individual factors, stability over time (test-retest) and an analysis of criterion validity were carried out. Both in the group of adults and adolescents, obtained a three-factor structure, acceptable reliability and stability over time. Moreover PBI correlated with another Polish tool in line with the adopted hypotheses, showing satisfactory criteria validity.

Indexed as

Parent-Child RelationsParentsAdolescentAdultChildHumansPolandPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36006910
PMCPMC9409573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.