Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006907›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A multidisciplinary Prematurity Research Cohort Study.

Molly J Stout, Jessica Chubiz, Nandini Raghuraman, Peinan Zhao, Methodius G Tuuli, Lihong V Wang, Alison G Cahill, Phillip S Cuculich, Yong Wang, Emily S Jungheim and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structure-function coupling in the first month of life: Associations with age and attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prenatal social disadvantage is associated with alterations in functional networks at birth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Molly J StoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Jessica ChubizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Nandini RaghuramanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Peinan ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Methodius G TuuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Lihong V WangDepartment of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.
Alison G CahillDepartment of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Phillip S CuculichDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Yong WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Emily S JungheimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-8773
Erik D HerzogDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Justin FayDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1893-877X
Alan L SchwartzDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
George A MaconesDepartment of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Sarah K EnglandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4247-0281
Washington University in St. Louis · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USBrown University · USCalifornia Institute of Technology · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

WUIDDRC Supplement-Supporting the health and well-being of children with intellectual and developmental disability during COVID-19 pandemicP50HD103525 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFREY D MILBRANDT · 2020 to 2026
$15.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, 10% of babies are born preterm, defined as a live birth before 37 weeks of gestation. Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death, and survivors face lifelong risks of adverse outcomes. New approaches with large sample sizes are needed to identify strategies to predict and prevent preterm birth. The primary aims of the Washington University Prematurity Research Cohort Study were to conduct three prospective projects addressing possible causes of preterm birth and provide data and samples for future research. STUDY

designPregnant patients were recruited into the cohort between January 2017 and January 2020. Consenting patients were enrolled into the study before 20 weeks' gestation and followed through delivery. Participants completed demographic and lifestyle surveys; provided maternal blood, placenta samples, and cord blood; and participated in up to three projects focused on underlying physiology of preterm birth: cervical imaging (Project 1), circadian rhythms (Project 2), and uterine magnetic resonance imaging and electromyometrial imaging (Project 3).

resultsA total of 1260 participants were enrolled and delivered during the study period. Of the participants, 706 (56%) were Black/African American, 494 (39%) were nulliparous, and 185 (15%) had a previous preterm birth. Of the 1260 participants, 1220 (97%) delivered a live infant. Of the 1220 with a live birth, 163 (14.1%) had preterm birth, of which 74 (6.1%) were spontaneous preterm birth. Of the 1220 participants with a live birth, 841 participated in cervical imaging, 1047 contributed data and/or samples on circadian rhythms, and 39 underwent uterine magnetic resonance imaging. Of the 39, 25 underwent electromyometrial imaging.

conclusionWe demonstrate feasibility of recruiting and retaining a diverse cohort in a complex prospective, longitudinal study throughout pregnancy. The extensive clinical, imaging, survey, and biologic data obtained will be used to explore cervical, uterine, and endocrine physiology of preterm birth and can be used to develop novel approaches to predict and prevent preterm birth.

Indexed as

Premature BirthCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36006907
PMCPMC9409532
OpenAlexW4293093118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.