Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006678›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2022

Creating and Implementing a Principal Investigator Tool Kit for Enhancing Accrual to Late Phase Clinical Trials: Development and Usability Study.

Kristin A Higgins, Alexandra Thomas, Nancy Soto, Rebecca Paulus, Thomas J George, Thomas B Julian, Sharon Hartson Stine, Merry Jennifer Markham, Maria Werner-Wasik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03811002 (Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03811002 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC): A Phase III Randomized Study of Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation Plus Atezolizumab

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2019 to 2029Enrolled544ConditionsLimited Stage Lung Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage I Lung Cancer AJCC v8, Stage II Lung Cancer AJCC v8, Stage III Lung Cancer AJCC v8Arms3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy, Atezolizumab, Biospecimen Collection, Carboplatin, Cisplatin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin A HigginsWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1496-9878
Alexandra Thomas *Atrium Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-2229
Nancy SotoNRG Oncology Operations Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1567-9891
Rebecca PaulusNRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7312-1194
Thomas J GeorgeUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-9180
Thomas B JulianAllegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-3141
Sharon Hartson StineNRG Operations Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-7133
Merry Jennifer MarkhamUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3567-3494
Maria Werner-WasikSidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9222-2668
American College of Radiology · USUniversity of Florida · USAllegheny Health Network · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USEmory University · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
Winship National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233247 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ashesh Jani, NABIL F SABA · 2019 to 2026
$6.0M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccrual to oncology clinical trials remains a challenge, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. For late phase clinical trials funded by the National Cancer Institute, the development of these research protocols is a resource-intensive process; however, mechanisms to optimize patient accrual after trial activation are underdeveloped across the National Clinical Trial Network (NCTN). Low patient accrual can lead to the premature closure of clinical trials and can ultimately delay the availability of new, potentially life-saving therapies in oncology.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to formally create an easily implemented tool kit of resources for investigators of oncology clinical trials within the NCTN, specifically the NRG Oncology cooperative group, in order to optimize patient accrual.

methodsNRG Oncology sought to formally develop a tool kit of resources to use at specific time points during the lifetime of NRG Oncology clinical trials. The tools are clearly described and involve the facilitation of engagement of the study principal investigator with the scientific and patient advocate community during the planning, activation, and accrual periods. Social media tools are also leveraged to enhance such engagement. The principal investigator (PI) tool kit was created in 2019 and thereafter piloted with the NRG Oncology/Alliance NRG-LU005 phase II or III trial in small-cell lung cancer. The PI tool kit was developed by the NRG Oncology Protocol Operations Management committee and was tested with the NRG/Alliance LU005 randomized trial within the NCTN.

resultsNRG Oncology/Alliance NRG-LU005 has seen robust enrollment, currently 127% of the projected accrual. Importantly, many of the tool kit elements are already being used in ongoing NRG Oncology trials, with 56% of active NRG trials using at least one element of the PI tool kit and all in-development trials offered the resource. This underscores the feasibility and potential benefits of deploying the PI tool kit across all NRG Oncology trials moving forward.

conclusionsWhile clinical trial accrual can be challenging, the PI tool kit has been shown to augment accrual in a low-cost and easily implementable fashion. It could be widely and consistently deployed across the NCTN to improve accrual in oncology clinical trials.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03811002; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03811002.

Indexed as

accrualactivationclinical trialclinical trial accrualcommunitydevelopmentengagementinvestigatorsoncologypatientPI toolkitplanningprincipal investigatorresourcessocial mediasocial media toolsstudytool

Identifiers

PMID36006678
PMCPMC9459930
OpenAlexW4293089460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.