ArticleJAMA network open2022
Comparison of Home-Based vs Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Hospitalization, Medication Adherence, and Risk Factor Control Among Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Exercise Duration and Intensity on Maximal Exercise Capacity Over 6 Months in Coronary Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes-A Secondary Analysis of the LeIKDTrial.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Trial
- A Dual-Modality Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program for Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: Single-Arm Remote Clinical Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Trial
- The iATTEND Trial: A Trial Comparing Hybrid Versus Standard Cardiac Rehabilitation.The American journal of cardiology · 2024Trial
- Impact of telehealth modalities on medication adherence in older adults with heart disease: Evidence from NHATS.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Technologies in the Context of Cardiovascular Prevention From Early Detection to Cardiac Recovery: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Association Between Medication Adherence and Symptom Control in Patients With Chronic Stable Angina.Cureus · 2026Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Core Components and Long-Term Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring Factors Influencing Healthcare Providers' Referral Decisions to Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Riyadh City: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Narrative Review of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Potential profiles and associated factors of medication safety competence at home: a study in the older adults following percutaneous coronary intervention.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Comparative Systematic Review of Home-Based and Center-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation of Delivery Models and Outcomes.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Review
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Trends Among Commercially Insured Adults in the United States, 2017-2023.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Article
- Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction-Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Approach and Management During Cardiac Rehabilitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Exercise training for myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury: Mechanism and clinical practice (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Disparities in Geographic Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Socially Vulnerable Communities.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Extended Telemonitored Follow-Up After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Healthcare Pathway That Improves Cardiovascular Prevention and Patient Experience, and Reduces Outpatient Visits.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Hybrid Chart Review of Premature Coronary Artery Disease: An Opportunity to Improve Diagnostic Excellence and Management.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Modern Era: Evidence, Equity, and Evolving Delivery Models Across the Cardiovascular Spectrum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Prior studies have suggested that participation in home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) vs center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) results in similar clinical outcomes in patients with low to moderate risk; however, outcome data from demographically diverse populations and patients who are medically complex are lacking. Objective: To compare hospitalizations, medication adherence, and cardiovascular risk factor control between participants in HBCR vs CBCR. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), an integrated health care system serving approximately 4.7 million patients, who participated in CR between April 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, and with follow-up through April 30, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to January 2022. Exposures: Participation in 1 or more HBCR or CBCR sessions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 12-month all-cause hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations at 30 and 90 days; 30-day, 90-day, and 12-month cardiovascular hospitalizations; and medication adherence and cardiovascular risk factor control at 12 months. Logistic regression was used to compare hospitalization, medication adherence, and cardiovascular risk factor control, with inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to adjust for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Of 2556 patients who participated in CR (mean [SD] age, 66.7 [11.2] years; 754 [29.5%] women; 1196 participants [46.8%] with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4), there were 289 Asian or Pacific Islander patients (11.3%), 193 Black patients (7.6%), 611 Hispanic patients (23.9%), and 1419 White patients (55.5%). A total of 1241 participants (48.5%) received HBCR and 1315 participants (51.5%) received CBCR. After IPTW, patients who received HBCR had lower odds of hospitalization at 12 months (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97) but similar odds of adherence to β-blockers (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.98-1.42) and statins (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25) and of control of blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.17), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.81-1.20), and hemoglobin A1c (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.18) at 12 months compared with patients who received CBCR. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that HBCR in a demographically diverse population, including patients with high risk who are medically complex, was associated with fewer hospitalizations at 12 months compared with patients who participated in CBCR. This study strengthens the evidence supporting HBCR in previously understudied patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.