Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006635›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2022

Association of COVID-19 Infection With Wearing Glasses in a High-Prevalence Area in Denmark and Sweden.

Rasmus Gregersen, Rikke Kart Jacobsen, Jannie Laursen, Regine Mobech, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Kasper Iversen, Janne Petersen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eyeglasses and risk of COVID-19 transmission-analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rasmus GregersenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rikke Kart JacobsenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jannie LaursenDepartment of Global Business Quality Management, Falck, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Regine MobechDepartment of Global Business Quality Management, Falck, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sisse Rye OstrowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper IversenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janne PetersenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Quality of Life Research Center · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKGentofte Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Observational studies have indicated that glasses might protect against contracting COVID-19 through reduced airborne and contact transmission. Objective: To investigate the association between wearing one's own glasses with contracting COVID-19 when adjusting for relevant confounders. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (June to August 2020) in Denmark and Sweden, where personal protective equipment was not recommended for the general population at the time. Employees at Falck, an international rescue corps with different job functions (ambulance, health care, office, and field staff, firefighters, and roadside assistance) participated in the study. Exposures: The main exposure was wearing glasses (also including contact lenses and reading glasses), which was assessed in a questionnaire. Persons wearing glasses were compared with those who did not wear glasses (ie, nonusers). To adjust for potential confounders, information on age, sex, job function, and number of workday contacts were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was COVID-19 infection before (positive polymerase chain reaction test) or during the study period (biweekly voluntary tests with a rapid test). The investigated hypothesis was formulated after collecting the data. Results: A total of 1279 employees in Denmark and 841 in Sweden were included (839 [39.6%] female and 1281 [60.4%] male; 20.5% were aged <40 years; 57.0%, 40-60 years, and 22.5%, >60 years). Of these, 829 individuals (64.8%) in Denmark and 619 (73.6%) in Sweden wore glasses. Wearing glasses was inversely associated with COVID-19 infection in the Swedish cohort (odds ratio [OR], 0.61 [95% CI, 0.37-0.99]; P = .047; seroprevalence, 9.3%) but not in the Danish cohort (OR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.53-2.45]; P = .73; seroprevalence, 2.4%). Adjusting for age, sex, job function, and number of workday contacts in Sweden, wearing glasses no longer was associated with COVID-19 infection (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.37-1.11]; P = .11). When stratifying by job function, a large difference was observed among office staff (OR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06-0.70]; P = .01) but not ambulance staff (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.41-1.67]; P = .60) nor health care staff (OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.35-2.30]; P = .81). Conclusions and Relevance: While wearing one's glasses was inversely associated with COVID-19 in Sweden in an unadjusted analysis, an association no longer was identified when adjusting for confounders. These results provide inconclusive findings regarding whether wearing one's own glasses is associated with a decreased risk of COVID-19 infections.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2Seroepidemiologic StudiesSweden

Identifiers

PMID36006635
PMCPMC9412836
OpenAlexW4293102362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.