Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006571›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2022

The Utilization of a Rapid Agitation Scale and Treatment Protocol for Patient and Staff Safety in an Inpatient Psychiatric Setting.

Tessa Manning, Sarah Beth Bell, Drew Dawson, Krista Kezbers, Micheal Crockett, Ondria Gleason

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Turkish Version of the Modified Agitation Severity Scale: Validity and Reliability Study.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Assaults and Microaggressions Against Psychiatric Residents: Findings from a US Survey.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tessa ManningSchool of Community Medicine, The University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA. Tessa-Manning@ouhsc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-8183
Sarah Beth BellSchool of Community Medicine, The University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Drew DawsonOklahoma City Indian Clinic, 5208 W Reno Ave, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Krista KezbersSchool of Community Medicine, The University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Micheal CrockettSchool of Community Medicine, The University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Ondria GleasonSchool of Community Medicine, The University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, USA.
University of Oklahoma · USTulsa Community College · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agitation is a common and potentially dangerous condition requiring rapid recognition and treatment in acute psychiatric units. Prompt intervention can prevent a patient with agitation from harming themselves, harming others, or needing restraints or seclusion. After the review of numerous guidelines, the Modified Agitation Severity Scale (MASS) agitation treatment protocol was developed to identify and manage agitation in an inpatient adult psychiatric setting. This protocol involved modifying an existing agitation scale and pairing scores with a treatment algorithm to indicate which behavioral and medication interventions would be most appropriate. All scoring and interventions were recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). Three months of data were collected before and after the protocol was implemented. The new, modified scale had high reliability and correlated well with another validated agitation scale. Perceived patient safety was high during both study phases. Nurses' perceptions of safety trended upward after the protocol was implemented, though these differences were not significant, likely due to insufficient power. Although there was no decrease in seclusion events after implementation of the treatment protocol, there was a 44% decrease in restraint events and average restraint minutes per incident. Despite a potential increase in workload for nursing staff, implementation of the protocol did not increase burnout scores. Physicians continued to order the protocol for 55% of patients after the study period ended. These findings suggest that including a rapid agitation assessment and protocol within the EMR potentially improves nurses' perceptions of unit safety, helps assess treatment response, reduces time patients spend restrained, and supports decision making for nurses.

Indexed as

InpatientsRestraint, PhysicalAdultClinical ProtocolsHumansPatient SafetyPsychomotor AgitationReproducibility of Results(4–6): agitationAgitation severity scaleInpatientMASSPsychiatric medicationQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36006571
PMCPMC9402403
OpenAlexW4293105225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.