Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006518›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

Differing sizes of bullet entrance holes in skin of the anterior and posterior trunk.

D Geisenberger, M Große Perdekamp, S Pollak, A Thierauf-Emberger, V Thoma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic firearm examination, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D GeisenbergerInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
M Große PerdekampInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
S PollakInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
A Thierauf-EmbergerInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
V ThomaInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Albertstraße 9, 79104, Freiburg, Germany. vanessa.thoma@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to establish whether the size (diameter and area) of bullet entrance holes in skin varies between distant shots to the anterior and posterior trunk, respectively, when using the same ammunition (in concreto pistol cartridges 9 mm Luger). For that purpose, specimens of porcine skin from the belly region and the back were taken (10 samples each) and shot at from a distance of 1.6 m. The entrance holes were photo-documented under standardised conditions. After image processing for contrast enhancement, the maximum diameter and the area of each skin defect were measured automatically by means of an image analysis system. Both size parameters differed significantly depending on the body region affected. On the back with its comparatively thick dermis, the skin defects were considerably smaller than those on the ventral trunk where the corium is less thick. This difference can be explained by the fact that the elastic properties of skin are strongly determined by the connective tissue which is especially rich in fibres. The study results were consistent with the authors' casework experience and support the assumption that the entrance site of gunshot wounds has a major influence on the size of the bullet hole in skin.

Indexed as

FirearmsWounds, GunshotAnimalsForensic BallisticsSkinSwineAbdominal skinBullet entrance holeDorsal skinSize of gunshot entranceSkin defect

Identifiers

PMID36006518
PMCPMC9576652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.