Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006501›Full record

ArticleMolecular diversity2023

Computational design of PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Jaikanth Chandrasekaran, Senthilkumar Elumalai, Vidya Murugesan, Selvaraj Kunjiappan, Parasuraman Pavadai, Panneerselvam Theivendren

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diversity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FungalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jaikanth ChandrasekaranDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy & Technology Management, SVKM'S NMIMS University, Secunderabad, 500017, India. jaikanthjai@gmail.com.
Senthilkumar ElumalaiDepartment of Pharmacology, PSG College of Pharmacy, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, 641004, India.
Vidya MurugesanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Science and Commerce, M S Ramaiah College of Arts, Bengaluru, 560054, India.
Selvaraj KunjiappanDepartment of Biotechnology, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Krishnankoil, 626126, India.
Parasuraman PavadaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, 560054, India.
Panneerselvam TheivendrenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Swamy Vivekanandha College of Pharmacy, Tiruchengodu, 637205, India.
Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education · INM S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences · INNarsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies · INSwami Vivekanand College of Pharmacy · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug repurposing opens new avenues in cancer therapy. Drug repurposing, or finding new uses for existing drugs, can substantially reduce drug discovery time and costs. Cheminformatics, genetics, and systems biology advances enable repositioning drugs. Clinical usage of PD-1/PD-L1 blocking has been approved because of its efficacy in improving prognosis in select groups. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis was considered to represent a mechanism for tumour evasion of host tumour antigen-specific T-cell immunity in early preclinical research. The expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells causes T lymphocytes to become exhausted by transmitting a co-inhibitory signal. A better understanding of how PD-L1 is regulated in cancer cells could lead to new therapeutic options. In this view, the study was aimed to repurpose the existing FDA-approved drugs as a potential PD-L1 inhibitor through e-Pharmacophore modelling, molecular docking and dynamic simulation. e-Pharmacophore screening retrieved 324 FDA-approved medications with the fitness score ≥ 1. The top 10-docked FDA candidates were compared with IN-35 (Clinical trial candidate) for its interaction pattern with critical amino acid residues. Mirabegron and Indacaterol exhibited a greater affinity for PD-L1 with docking scores of - 9.213 kcal mol

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasmsAcetanilidesAmino AcidsB7-H1 AntigenMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorThiazolesAcetanilidesAmino AcidsB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsmirabegronProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorThiazolesCancerDockingDynamic simulatione-PharmacophorePD-1/PD-L1Repurposing

Identifiers

PMID36006501
OpenAlexW4293102053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.