ArticleRheumatology international2022
Perspective of sarcoidosis in terms of rheumatology: a single-center rheumatology clinic experience.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rheumatic Manifestations of Sarcoidosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Rheumatologic Perspectives on Sarcoidosis: Predicting Sarcoidosis-Associated Arthritis Through Comprehensive Clinical and Laboratory Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Chronic Sarcoidosis: Diagnostic Difficulties and Search for New Criteria of Inflammatory Activity (A Case Report and Literature Review).Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sarcoidosis may present with many rheumatological symptoms as well as mimic and/or may occur concomitantly with many other rheumatic diseases. We examined the demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis in the rheumatology department. This study planned as retrospective cross-sectional study. Medical records of patients who applied to our rheumatology outpatient clinic due to complain of musculoskeletal problems and then diagnosed sarcoidosis were retrospectively investigated. Joint findings, extrapulmonary involvements, and coexisting rheumatic disease were evaluated. Fifty-six patients (41.21 ± 7.83 years, 75% female) were included. The duration of the disease was 49.61 ± 29.11 months, and the follow-up period was 26.66 ± 13.26 months. All patients had pulmonary system involvement. Arthralgia was present in 91.10% of 56 patients and arthritis in 89.29% of patients. Examining the subtypes of the arthritis findings, mono-arthritis was found in 31/50 (62%) patients, oligo-arthritis in 15/50 (30%) patients, and polyarthritis in 4/50 (8%) patients. A total of 11 (19.60%) patients were diagnosed with uveitis. Excision of the mediastinal LAP was performed in a total of 37 patients (66.1%) and became the most commonly employed method. Considering the treatment distribution of the patients under followed-up, it is seen that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory treatments were used in 15 (26.8%) patients, corticosteroids in a total of 40 (71.4%) patients, methotrexate in a total of 15 patients (26.8%), azathioprine in six (10.7%) patients, hydroxychloroquine in 14 (25%) patients, and infliximab in one (1.8%) patient. As sarcoidosis is a mimicking disease, a good differential diagnosis should be made to avoid misdiagnosis and in order not to be late in diagnosis and treatment. Physicians, especially rheumatologists, should remember sarcoidosis more frequently as the disease may overlap with other rheumatological diseases and may occur with many rheumatological manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.