ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Artificial intelligence and radiomics : Value in cardiac MRI].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of AI-assisted compressed sensing cine sequence in the assessment of cardiac function in children with Kawasaki disease.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueCardiac diseases are the leading cause of death. Many diseases can be specifically treated once a valid diagnosis is established. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in the workup of many cardiac pathologies. However, image acquisition as well as interpretation and related secondary image evaluation are time-consuming and complex. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsCardiac MRI is becoming increasingly established in international guidelines for the evaluation of cardiac function and differential diagnosis of a wide variety of cardiac diseases. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Cardiac MRI has limited reproducibility due to the acquisition technique and interpretation of findings with complex secondary measurements. Artificial intelligence techniques and radiomics offer the potential to improve the acquisition, interpretation, and reproducibility of cardiac MRI. PERFORMANCE: Research suggests that artificial intelligence and radiomic analysis can improve cardiac MRI in terms of image acquisition and also diagnostic and prognostic value. Furthermore, the implementation of artificial intelligence and radiomics may result in the identification of new biomarkers. ACHIEVEMENTS AND PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: The implementation of artificial intelligence in cardiac MRI has great potential. However, the current level of evidence is still limited in some aspects; in particular there are too few prospective and large multicenter studies available. As a result, the algorithms developed are often not sufficiently validated scientifically and are not yet applied in clinical routine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36006439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.