Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006437›Full record

Trial reportStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2022

Impact of dosimetric factors on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients after (chemo)radiotherapy-results from a prospective randomized trial.

Anastassia Löser, Maximilian Grohmann, Anna Finger, Franziska Greinert, Linda Krause, Isabel Molwitz, Andreas Krüll, Cordula Petersen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anastassia LöserDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. an.loeser@uke.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4981-7217
Maximilian GrohmannDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna FingerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska GreinertDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Linda KrauseInstitute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabel MolwitzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas KrüllDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Cordula PetersenDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Outpatient Center of the UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectiveTo analyze dose-volume histogram (DVH)-derived data on the exposure of organs at risk with impact on long-term percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence in head and neck cancer patients at 6 and 12 months after definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-one patients were prospectively treated with (chemo)radiotherapy. Prophylactic or reactive gastrostomy tube placement was performed in 41 (67.2%) patients. Dose-volume histogram parameters were obtained for the swallowing apparatus.

resultsMedian follow-up time was 25 (2-34) months. Overall survival was shorter in patients with inlying PEG tubes at 6 and 12 months (log rank p = 0.038 and p = 0.017) after therapy completion. The estimated median time of tube dependency was 6 (95% confidence interval: 2-14) months. After 6 months, 46.5% of patients were tube dependent. After 12 months, this estimated proportion fell to 31.5%. For both time points, the volume to the larynx (in %) receiving at least 50 Gy (larynx V50Gy) exceeding 53% was predictive for long-term tube feeding (6 months: p = 0.041 and 12 months: p = 0.042) being an independent predictor during multivariable analysis. There was no clinical feature influencing tube dependence after 12 months.

conclusionLong-term gastrostomy dependence was found to be strongly associated with an exposure of laryngeal structures (specifically, V50Gy ≥ 53%) during radiotherapy. Consequently, the avoidance of supraglottic as well as glottic structures is warranted.

Indexed as

GastrostomyHead and Neck NeoplasmsEnteral NutritionHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDVH parametersInferior constrictor muscleLarynxPEG tubeToxicity

Identifiers

PMID36006437
PMCPMC9581845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.