ArticleACS nano2022
The "Bloodless" Blood Test: Intradermal Prick Nanoelectronics for the Blood Extraction-Free Multiplex Detection of Protein Biomarkers.
Article in ACS nano, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microneedle technology in the treatment of ocular diseases: Advances and applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- A Versatile Single-Step Micro- to Nanoparticles Laser Graphitization-Driven Conversion Route for Graphene-Embedded Nanoparticle Composites.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Microscale Architectures for Intelligent Soft Robotics: From Functional Microneedles to Biointegrated Wearable Systems.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Body Biofluids for Minimally-Invasive Diagnostics: Insights, Challenges, Emerging Technologies, and Clinical Potential.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Nanomaterials-enabled point-of-care diagnostics for pathogens.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Integration Strategies and Formats in Field-Effect Transistor Chemo- and Biosensors: A Critical Review.ACS sensors · 2025Review
- Transdermal Minimally Invasive Optical Multiplex Detection of Protein Biomarkers by Nanopillars Array-Embedded Microneedles.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Review
- Optimization of Surface Functionalizations for Ring Resonator-Based Biosensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Implantable Electrochemical Microsensors for In Vivo Monitoring of Animal Physiological Information.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- Microneedle-Integrated Sensors for Extraction of Skin Interstitial Fluid and Metabolic Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein biomarkers' detection is of utmost importance for preventive medicine and early detection of illnesses. Today, their detection relies entirely on clinical tests consisting of painful, invasive extraction of large volumes of venous blood; time-consuming postextraction sample manipulation procedures; and mostly label-based complex detection approaches. Here, we report on a point-of-care (POC) diagnosis paradigm based on the application of intradermal finger prick-based electronic nanosensors arrays for protein biomarkers' direct detection and quantification down to the sub-pM range, without the need for blood extraction and sample manipulation steps. The nanobioelectronic array performs biomarker sensing by a rapid intradermal prick-based sampling of proteins biomarkers directly from the capillary blood pool accumulating at the site of the microneedle puncture, requiring only 2 min and less than one microliter of a blood sample for a complete analysis. A 1 mm long microneedle element was optimal in allowing for pain-free dermal sampling with a 100% success rate of reaching and rupturing dermis capillaries. Current common micromachining processes and top-down fabrication techniques allow the nanobioelectronic sensor arrays to provide accurate and reliable clinical diagnostic results using multiple sensing elements in each microneedle and all-in-one direct and label-free multiplex biomarkers detection. Preliminary successful clinical studies performed on human volunteers demonstrated the ability of our intradermal, in-skin, blood extraction-free detection platform to accurately detect protein biomarkers as a plausible POC detection for future replacement of today's invasive clinical blood tests. This approach can be readily extended in the future to detect other clinically relevant circulating biomarkers, such as miRNAs, free-DNAs, exosomes, and small metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.