Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36006141›Full record

ArticleToxics2022

Biochar Is Not Durable for Remediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils Affected by Acid-Mine Drainage.

Junhao Qin, Xi Wang, Jidong Ying, Chuxia Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Junhao QinCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xi WangCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Jidong YingCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Chuxia LinCentre for Regional and Rural Futures, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
South China Agricultural University · CNDeakin University · AU

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515011583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biochar is a soil conditioner for enhancing plant growth and reducing plants' uptake of heavy metals. However, the protonation of biochar surfaces in acid soils can weaken the capacity of biochar to reduce the phytoavailability of soil-borne heavy metals over time. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by performing a plant-growth experiment with five harvest cycles to examine the durability of rice-straw biochar for the remediation of an acidic-mine-water-contaminated soil. The application of the biochar significantly reduced the phytoavailability of the heavy metals and inhibited the plant uptake of cationic heavy metals but not anionic Cr. The beneficial effects of the biochar were weakened with the increasing number of harvest cycles caused by the gradual protonation of the biochar surfaces, which resulted in the desorption of the adsorbed heavy metals. The weakening capacity of the biochar to reduce the heavy-metal uptake by the vegetable plants was more evident for Cu, Zn, and Pb compared to Ni and Cd. The experimental results generally confirmed the hypothesis. It was also observed that the bioaccessible amount of various metals in the edible portion of the vegetable was also reduced as a result of the biochar application.

Indexed as

bioaccessibilitybiocharcontaminated soilheavy metalphytoavailabilityplant uptake

Identifiers

PMID36006141
PMCPMC9416525
OpenAlexW4291670495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.