Trial reportLa Tunisie medicale
Evaluation of the Distal Radial Approach in percutaneous coronary interventions. Controlled, randomized non-inferiority trial.
Trial report in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05311111 (Efficacy and Safety of the Distal Radial Approach in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of the Distal Radial Approach in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Simulation versus theoretical learning for the transradial approach: a randomized controlled trial in interventional cardiology.La Tunisie medicale · 2023Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
research problemThe conventional radial approach is the recommended vascular access for percutaneous coronary interventions. It is effective and feasible but associated with a risk of occlusion of the radial artery. The distal radial approach is proposed as a new approach to reduce complications and preserve the radial artery. However, few clinical trials in real life were conducted in North African patients. This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the distal radial approach versus the conventional radial approach. Investigative process : This trial is a non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms: distal radial approach and conventional radial approach. Two hundred fifty patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention will be included. The two main endpoints are the puncture success rate with a non-inferiority margin of 10% and the occlusion rate of the punctured radial artery attributed to the end of hemostasis and to 30 days. Secondary Endpoints : catheterization success, crossover rate, procedure time, radial artery spasm, bleeding complications, QuickDASH pain score, Operator satisfaction. A single blind analysis will be led according to the per-protocol and intention-to-treat methods. RESEARCH PLAN: Ethical considerations will be undertaken and respected. This trial will run for four months from February 2022. The results will provide parameters related to the efficacy and safety of the distal radial approach, improving clinical practice.
trial registrationNCT05311111.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36005910PMC9387641W4293105056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.