Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005887›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

propeller: testing for differences in cell type proportions in single cell data.

Belinda Phipson, Choon Boon Sim, Enzo R Porrello, Alex W Hewitt, Joseph Powell, Alicia Oshlack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 267 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
267citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

267 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

207 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Belinda PhipsonBioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1711-7454
Choon Boon SimHeart Regeneration Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Enzo R PorrelloHeart Regeneration Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Alex W HewittMenzies Institute for Medical Research, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Joseph PowellGarvan-Weizmann Centre for Cellular Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5070-4124
Alicia OshlackBioinformatics and Computational Biology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSingle cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-seq) has rapidly gained popularity over the last few years for profiling the transcriptomes of thousands to millions of single cells. This technology is now being used to analyse experiments with complex designs including biological replication. One question that can be asked from single cell experiments, which has been difficult to directly address with bulk RNA-seq data, is whether the cell type proportions are different between two or more experimental conditions. As well as gene expression changes, the relative depletion or enrichment of a particular cell type can be the functional consequence of disease or treatment. However, cell type proportion estimates from scRNA-seq data are variable and statistical methods that can correctly account for different sources of variability are needed to confidently identify statistically significant shifts in cell type composition between experimental conditions.

resultsWe have developed propeller, a robust and flexible method that leverages biological replication to find statistically significant differences in cell type proportions between groups. Using simulated cell type proportions data, we show that propeller performs well under a variety of scenarios. We applied propeller to test for significant changes in cell type proportions related to human heart development, ageing and COVID-19 disease severity. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The propeller method is publicly available in the open source speckle R package (https://github.com/phipsonlab/speckle). All the analysis code for the article is available at the associated analysis website: https://phipsonlab.github.io/propeller-paper-analysis/. The speckle package, analysis scripts and datasets have been deposited at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7009042. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

COVID-19Single-Cell AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansRNASequence Analysis, RNASoftwareRNA

Identifiers

PMID36005887
PMCPMC9563678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.