Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005810›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2022

Comparative Study of Bacterial SPOR Domains Identifies Functionally Important Differences in Glycan Binding Affinity.

Atsushi Yahashiri, Gabriela M Kaus, David L Popham, Jon C D Houtman, David S Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FtsZ-mediated spatial-temporal control over septal cell wall synthesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Lytic transglycosylase Slt of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a periplasmic hub protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Atsushi YahashiriDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowagrid.214572.7, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Gabriela M KausDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowagrid.214572.7, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
David L PophamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Techgrid.438526.e, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-143X
Jon C D HoutmanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowagrid.214572.7, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
David S WeissDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowagrid.214572.7, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-0070

Funding

TRAINING IN MECHANISMS OF PARASITISMT32AI007511 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUTLER, NOAH SULLIVAN, WEBER, MARY · 1996 to 2025
$8.1M
Peptidoglycan binding protein specificity and bacterial cell divisionR01GM125656 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEISS, DAVID S · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
Studies of Bacterial Endospore Germination - Adminstrative SupplementR01GM138630 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI POPHAM, DAVID L · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
CD4 T cell intrinsic signaling defects during viral exhaustionR21AI157121 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HOUTMAN, JON C.D., VARGA, STEVEN M · 2021 to 2022
$425k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI157121NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007511NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125656NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial SPOR domains target proteins to the divisome by binding septal peptidoglycan (PG) at sites where cell wall amidases have removed stem peptides. These PG structures are referred to as denuded glycans. Although all characterized SPOR domains bind denuded glycans, whether there are differences in affinity is not known. Here, we use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine the relative PG glycan binding affinity (<i>K</i><sub>d</sub>) of four Escherichia coli SPOR domains and one Cytophaga hutchinsonii SPOR domain. We found that the <i>K</i><sub>d</sub> values ranged from approximately 1 μM for E. coli DamX<sup>SPOR</sup> and <i>C. hutchinsonii</i> CHU2221<sup>SPOR</sup> to about 10 μM for E. coli FtsN<sup>SPOR</sup>. To investigate whether these differences in PG binding affinity are important for SPOR domain protein function, we constructed and characterized a set of DamX and FtsN "swap" proteins. As expected, all SPOR domain swap proteins localized to the division site, and, in the case of FtsN, all of the heterologous SPOR domains supported cell division. However, for DamX, only the high-affinity SPOR domain from CHU2221 supported normal function in cell division. In summary, different SPOR domains bind denuded PG glycans with different affinities, which appears to be important for the functions of some SPOR domain proteins (e.g., DamX) but not for the functions of others (e.g., FtsN). <b>IMPORTANCE</b> SPOR domain proteins are prominent components of the cell division apparatus in a wide variety of bacteria. The primary function of SPOR domains is targeting proteins to the division site, which they accomplish by binding to septal peptidoglycan. However, whether SPOR domains have any functions beyond septal targeting is unknown. Here, we show that SPOR domains vary in their PG binding affinities and that, at least in the case of the E. coli cell division protein DamX, having a high-affinity SPOR domain contributes to proper function.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsPeptidoglycanAmidohydrolasesBacteriaEscherichia coliProtein BindingAmidohydrolasesEscherichia coli ProteinsPeptidoglycancell divisiondeoxycholatemureinpeptidoglycanSPOR domain

Identifiers

PMID36005810
PMCPMC9487507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.