Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005482›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2022

Around the EQUATOR with clinician-scientists transdisciplinary aging research (Clin-STAR) principles: Implementation science challenges and opportunities.

Christopher R Carpenter, Lauren T Southerland, Brendan P Lucey, Beth Prusaczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Implementation of geriatric clinical decision support in the emergency department for potentially inappropriate medications.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher R CarpenterDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Emergency Care Research Core, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2603-7157
Lauren T SoutherlandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3561-8332
Brendan P LuceyDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Beth PrusaczykDepartment of Medicine Institute for Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8495-0836

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Ferrante · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Clin-STAR Coordinating CenterU24AG065204 · NIA · AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH · PI Thomas Michael Gill, Kristine Yaffe · 2019 to 2026
$5.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS U24 AG065204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine and the National Institute on Aging increasingly understand that knowledge alone is necessary but insufficient to improve healthcare outcomes. Adapting the behaviors of clinicians, patients, and stakeholders to new standards of evidence-based clinical practice is often significantly delayed. In response, over the past twenty years, Implementation Science has developed as the study of methods and strategies that facilitate the uptake of evidence-based practice into regular use by practitioners and policymakers. One important advance in Implementation Science research was the development of Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI), which provided a 27-item checklist for researchers to consistently report essential elements of the implementation and intervention strategies. Using StaRI as a framework, this review discusses specific Implementation Science challenges for research with older adults, provides solutions for those obstacles, and opportunities to improve the value of this evolving approach to reduce the knowledge translation losses that exist between published research and clinical practice.

Indexed as

GeroscienceImplementation ScienceAgedAgingChecklistHumansInterdisciplinary Researchgeriatricsimplementation scienceknowledge translationreporting standards

Identifiers

PMID36005482
PMCPMC10538952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.