ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2022
Pregnancy Considerations in the Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy: hemodynamic challenges, maternal risk, and multidisciplinary management.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Balancing Risk and Hope: Insights Into Pregnancy Outcomes in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- Risk stratification and multidisciplinary management strategies for pregnancy complicated by pulmonary arterial hypertension: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- A nomogram model for predicting maternal cardiovascular complications and neonatal adverse outcomes in pregnant patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Management of Pulmonary Hypertension in Pregnancy.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Clinical outcomes of pregnancy in patients with pulmonary hypertension: A single center observational study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Observational
- When pulmonary arterial hypertension and pregnancy meet: a multidisciplinary clinical experts review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Exploring the patient perspective in pulmonary hypertension.The European respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Health Care Disparities in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023Review
- Epoprostenol Exposure During Pregnancy.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a vasoconstrictive disease of the distal pulmonary vasculature resulting in adverse right heart remodeling. Pregnancy in PAH patients is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality as well as neonatal and fetal complications. Pregnancy-associated changes in the cardiovascular, pulmonary, hormonal, and thrombotic systems challenge the complex PAH physiology. Due to the high risks, patients with PAH are currently counseled against pregnancy based on international consensus guidelines, but there are promising signs of improving outcomes, particularly for patients with mild disease. For patients who become pregnant, multidisciplinary care at a PAH specialist center is needed for peripartum monitoring, medication management, delivery, postpartum care, and complication management. Patients with PAH also require disease-specific counseling on contraception and breastfeeding. In this review, we detail the considerations for reproductive planning, pregnancy, and delivery for the multidisciplinary care of a patient with PAH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.