ArticlemSystems2022
Intraintestinal Analysis of the Functional Activity of Microbiomes and Its Application to the Common Marmoset Intestine.
Article in mSystems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Multi-omic profiling reveals distinct gut microbial and metabolic landscapes in golden snub-nosed monkeys under contrasting conservation strategies.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Article
- Gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic advances, and microbiome-based therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Decoding host-microbiome interactions through co-expression network analysis within the non-human primate intestine.mSystems · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intestinal microbiome is closely related to host health, and metatranscriptomic analysis can be used to assess the functional activity of microbiomes by quantifying microbial gene expression levels, helping elucidate the interactions between the microbiome and the environment. However, the functional changes in the microbiome along the host intestinal tract remain unknown, and previous analytical methods have limitations, such as potentially overlooking unknown genes due to dependence on existing databases. The objective of this study is to develop a computational pipeline combined with next-generation sequencing for spatial covariation analysis of the functional activity of microbiomes at multiple intestinal sites (biogeographic locations) within the same individual. This method reconstructs a reference metagenomic sequence across multiple intestinal sites and integrates the metagenome and metatranscriptome, allowing the gene expression levels of the microbiome, including unknown bacterial genes, to be compared among multiple sites. When this method was applied to metatranscriptomic analysis in the intestinal tract of common marmosets, a New World monkey, the reconstructed metagenome covered most of the expressed genes and revealed that the differences in microbial gene expression among the cecum, transverse colon, and feces were more dynamic and sensitive to environmental shifts than the abundances of the genes. In addition, metatranscriptomic profiling at three intestinal sites of the same individual enabled covariation analysis incorporating spatial relevance, accurately predicting the function of a total of 10,856 unknown genes. Our findings demonstrate that our proposed analytical method captures functional changes in microbiomes at the gene resolution level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.