Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005307›Full record

ReviewInsects2022

In Vitro Crude Protein Digestibility of Insects: A Review.

María Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Fernando G Barroso, Dmitri Fabrikov, María José Sánchez-Muros

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Exploring the Use ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Review
  13. Black Soldier Fly Larvae MealAquaculture nutrition · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Protein quality of edible insects in the view of current assessment methods.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Rodríguez-RodríguezDepartment of Applied Biology, CECOUAL, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4214-3865
Fernando G BarrosoDepartment of Applied Biology, CECOUAL, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8828-9686
Dmitri FabrikovDepartment of Applied Biology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5048-4232
María José Sánchez-MurosDepartment of Applied Biology, CEI3, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9066-9052
University of Almería · ES

Funding

MAPA-JACUMAR ACUINSECTUAL-FEDER UAL2020-AGR-B1882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high protein content of insects has been widely studied. They can be a good food alternative, and therefore it is important to study the effect of digestion on their protein. This review examines the different in vitro protein digestibility methodologies used in the study of different edible insects in articles published up to 2021. The most important variables to be taken into account in in vitro hydrolysis are the following: phases (oral, gastric and intestinal), enzymes, incubation time and temperature, method of quantification of protein hydrolysis and sample preprocessing. Insects have high digestibility data, which can increase or decrease depending on the processing of the insect prior to digestion, so it is important to investigate which processing methods improve digestibility. The most commonly used methods are gut extraction, different methods of slaughtering (freezing or blanching), obtaining protein isolates, defatting, thermal processing (drying or cooking) and extrusion. Some limitations have been encountered in discussing the results due to the diversity of methodologies used for digestion and digestibility calculation. In addition, articles evaluating the effect of insect processing are very limited. It is concluded that there is a need for the standardisation of in vitro hydrolysis protocols and their quantification to facilitate comparisons in future research.

Indexed as

hydrolysis degreeinsect mealinsect processingnitrogen balance

Identifiers

PMID36005307
PMCPMC9409466
OpenAlexW4288437726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.