Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005243›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2022

Bioengineering Tools Applied to Dentistry: Validation Methods for In Vitro and In Silico Analysis.

Jefferson David Melo de Matos, Daher Antonio Queiroz, Leonardo Jiro Nomura Nakano, Valdir Cabral Andrade, Nathália de Carvalho Ramos Ribeiro, Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges, Marco Antonio Bottino, Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer Lopes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jefferson David Melo de MatosCenter for Dental Biomaterials, Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida (UF Health), Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-0785
Daher Antonio QueirozDepartment of Restorative Dentistry & Prosthodontics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Dentistry, Houston, TX 77054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-8599
Leonardo Jiro Nomura NakanoDepartment of Biomaterials, Dental Materials, and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.
Valdir Cabral AndradeDepartment of Dentistry and Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora UFJF, Governador Valadares 36036-900, Brazil.
Nathália de Carvalho Ramos RibeiroDepartment of Biomaterials, Dental Materials, and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0977-5350
Alexandre Luiz Souto BorgesDepartment of Biomaterials, Dental Materials, and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5707-7565
Marco Antonio BottinoDepartment of Biomaterials, Dental Materials, and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.
Guilherme da Rocha Scalzer LopesDepartment of Biomaterials, Dental Materials, and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, Brazil.

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/24903-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the use of bioengineering tools, finite element analysis, strain gauge analysis, photoelastic analysis, and digital image correlation, in computational studies with greater validity and reproducibility. A bibliographic search was performed in the main health databases PUBMED and Scholar Google, in which different studies, among them, laboratory studies, case reports, systematic reviews, and literature reviews, which were developed in living individuals, were included. Therefore, articles that did not deal with the use of finite element analysis, strain gauge analysis, photoelastic analysis, and digital image correlation were excluded, as well as their use in computational studies with greater validity and reproducibility. According to the methodological analysis, it is observed that the average publication of articles in the Pubmed database was 2.03 and with a standard deviation of 1.89. While in Google Scholar, the average was 0.78 and the standard deviation was 0.90. Thus, it is possible to verify that there was a significant variation in the number of articles in the two databases. Modern dentistry finds in finite element analysis, strain gauge, photoelastic and digital image correlation a way to analyze the biomechanical behavior in dental materials to obtain results that assist to obtain rehabilitations with favorable prognosis and patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

computer simulationcomputing methodologiesdentistryfinite element analysis

Identifiers

PMID36005243
PMCPMC9406698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.