Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005219›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2022

Development and Initial Validation of the Safety Training Engagement Scale (STE-S).

Marco Giovanni Mariani, Gerardo Petruzziello, Michela Vignoli, Dina Guglielmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Introduction to The Special Issue "Safety Training Effectiveness: A Research Agenda".European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marco Giovanni MarianiDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0481-520X
Gerardo PetruzzielloDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-1643
Michela VignoliDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2583-5384
Dina GuglielmiDepartment of Education Studies "Giovanni Maria Bertin", University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safety training promotes safety at work, in particular through the use of engaging methods. This study introduces a newly developed measure of individual engagement in safety training, and aims to analyze the psychometric proprieties of the scale. The safety training engagement scale (STE) consists of five items pertaining to the trainee's dedication and absorption in a safety training session. Two studies are carried out to analyze the validity of the scale. The first study focuses on the construct (internal) validity, to examine the scale's internal consistency and dimensional structure. The second study seeks to provide further evidence for construct validity by testing the external validity of the scale. The sample consists of 913 (study 1) and 133 (study 2) participants in safety training programs in the field of the chemical industry who were invited to fill the STE scale after attending a safety training course. The results provide support to affirm the validity and reliability of the scale. The discussion describes the implication and the limitations of using the STE scale in practical safety training programs, and outlines recommendations for research to improve the scale's robustness.

Indexed as

absorptiondedicationengagementsafetyscale validationtraining

Identifiers

PMID36005219
PMCPMC9407578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.