Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005166›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

Recruiting Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors for Patient-Reported Outcome Research: Experiences and Sample Characteristics of the SURVAYA Study.

Carla Vlooswijk, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse, Silvie H M Janssen, Esther Derksen, Milou J P Reuvers, Rhodé Bijlsma, Suzanne E J Kaal, Jan Martijn Kerst, Jacqueline M Tromp, Monique E M M Bos and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Self-reported peripheral neuropathic symptoms in long-term adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: results of the SURVAYA study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Long-term health-related quality of life among adolescent and young adult breast cancer survivors.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Carla VlooswijkResearch and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8885-6302
Lonneke V van de Poll-FranseResearch and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Silvie H M JanssenDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-1739
Esther DerksenResearch and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3511 DT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Milou J P ReuversDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rhodé BijlsmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0980-6652
Suzanne E J KaalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan Martijn KerstDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline M TrompDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique E M M BosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tom van der HulleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roy I LalisangDepartment of Internal Medicine, GROW-School of Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht UMC+ Comprehensive Cancer Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janine NuverDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mathilde C M KouwenhovenDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5252-4365
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-3338
Olga HussonDepartment of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1387-8686
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBTilburg University · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipation of Adolescents and Young Adults with cancer (AYAs: 18-39 years at time of diagnosis) in patient-reported outcome studies is warranted given the limited knowledge of (long-term) physical and psychosocial health outcomes. We examined the representativeness of AYAs participating in the study, to observe the impact of various invitation methods on response rates and reasons for non-participation.

methodsA population-based, cross-sectional cohort study was performed among long-term (5-20 years) AYA cancer survivors. All participants were invited using various methods to fill in a questionnaire on their health outcomes, including enclosing a paper version of the questionnaire, and sending a reminder. Those who did not respond received a postcard in which they were asked to provide a reason for non-participation.

resultsIn total, 4.010 AYAs (response 36%) participated. Females, AYAs with a higher socio-economic status (SES), diagnosed more than 10 years ago, diagnosed with a central nervous system tumor, sarcoma, a lymphoid malignancy, stage III, or treated with systemic chemotherapy were more likely to participate. Including a paper questionnaire increased the response rate by 5% and sending a reminder by 13%. AYAs who did not participate were either not interested (47%) or did want to be reminded of their cancer (31%).

conclusionsStudy participation was significantly lower among specific subgroups of AYA cancer survivors. Higher response rates were achieved when a paper questionnaire was included, and reminders were sent. To increase representativeness of future AYA study samples, recruitment strategies could focus on integrating patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice and involving AYA patients to promote participation in research.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultadolescents and young adults with cancer (AYAs)health-related outcomesnon-participationpatient-reported outcomespopulation-based researchrecruitment strategies

Identifiers

PMID36005166
PMCPMC9406992
OpenAlexW4289110780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.