Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36005163›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

A Case for Offering HPV Self-Sampling to Well-Screened Women. Comment on Lesack et al. Willingness to Self-Collect a Sample for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening in a Well-Screened Cohort: HPV FOCAL Survey Results.

Roni Kraut, Donna Manca, Aisha Lofters, Oksana Babenko

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roni KrautDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Canada.
Donna MancaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Canada.
Aisha LoftersDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada.
Oksana BabenkoDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2T4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lesack et al. recently published a cross-sectional study that focused on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling in the screened population, a population not conventionally thought of for HPV self-sampling. They found 52% of well-screened, highly educated women who participated in the Human Papillomavirus For Cervical Cancer (HPV FOCAL) screening trial in British Columbia, Canada, would be willing to self-collect an HPV sample. We published a similar study in 2021 on well-screened, highly educated women affiliated with a family medicine clinic in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, and found that 60% of these women preferred to have the option of HPV self-sampling. Our findings reinforce Lesack et al.'s results and together provide evidence for offering HPV self-sampling as an option for the well-screened population.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlbertaCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPapillomaviridaeSelf CareVaginal Smearsattitudes and acceptance toward HPV self-samplingHPVHPV self-samplingHPV testing for cervix screeninghuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID36005163
PMCPMC9406424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.