Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004914›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

In Vivo Application of Silica-Derived Inks for Bone Tissue Engineering: A 10-Year Systematic Review.

Nicolas Touya, Ayako Washio, Chiaki Kitamura, Adrien Naveau, Yasuhiko Tabata, Raphaël Devillard, Olivia Kérourédan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Novel Approaches for the Treatment of Maxillofacial Defects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas TouyaUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BIOTIS, U1026, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0140-6371
Ayako WashioDivision of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, 2-6-1 Manazuru, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Japan.
Chiaki KitamuraDivision of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, 2-6-1 Manazuru, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Japan.
Adrien NaveauUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BIOTIS, U1026, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Yasuhiko TabataLaboratory of Biomaterials, Department of Regeneration Science and Engineering, Institute for Frontier Life and Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8397, Japan.
Raphaël DevillardUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BIOTIS, U1026, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-2044
Olivia KérourédanUniv. Bordeaux, INSERM, BIOTIS, U1026, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7967-5569
Université de Bordeaux · FRKyushu Dental University · JPKyoto University · JP

Funding

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer ARCMOB2021080004095Japan Society for the Promotion of Science P22101University of Bordeaux 191203_001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the need for efficient, sustainable, customizable, handy and affordable substitute materials for bone repair is critical, this systematic review aimed to assess the use and outcomes of silica-derived inks to promote in vivo bone regeneration. An algorithmic selection of articles was performed following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO method. After the initial selection, 51 articles were included. Silicon in ink formulations was mostly found to be in either the native material, but associated with a secondary role, or to be a crucial additive element used to dope an existing material. The inks and materials presented here were essentially extrusion-based 3D-printed (80%), and, overall, the most investigated animal model was the rabbit (65%) with a femoral defect (51%). Quality (ARRIVE 2.0) and risk of bias (SYRCLE) assessments outlined that although a large majority of ARRIVE items were "reported", most risks of bias were left "unclear" due to a lack of precise information. Almost all studies, despite a broad range of strategies and formulations, reported their silica-derived material to improve bone regeneration. The rising number of publications over the past few years highlights Si as a leverage element for bone tissue engineering to closely consider in the future.

Indexed as

3D printingbiofabricationbioprintingbone regenerationinkin vivosilicasiliciumsilicontissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36004914
PMCPMC9404869
OpenAlexW4291378306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.