CARDIOSIM

Beatrice De Lazzari, Roberto Badagliacca, Domenico Filomena, Silvia Papa, Carmine Dario Vizza, Massimo Capoccia, Claudio De Lazzari

Abstract readReview

PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher

In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

3citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

Review of Cardiovascular Mock Circulatory Loop Designs and Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Review
Modelling and Simulation of the Interactions Between the Cardiovascular System and the Combined Use of VA ECMO and IABP: Comparison Between Peripheral and Central Configurations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Article
Modelling and Simulation of the Combined Use of IABP and Impella as a Rescue Procedure in Cardiogenic Shock: An Alternative for Non-Transplant Centres?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatrice De LazzariDepartment of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, "Foro Italico" 4th University of Rome, 00135 Rome, Italy.

Roberto BadagliaccaDepartment of Clinical, Internal Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Domenico FilomenaDepartment of Clinical, Internal Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Silvia PapaDepartment of Clinical, Internal Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Carmine Dario VizzaDepartment of Clinical, Internal Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3540-4983

Massimo CapocciaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2351-9994

Claudio De LazzariNational Research Council, Institute of Clinical Physiology (IFC-CNR), 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5149-4109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is devoted to presenting the history of the CARDIOSIM

Indexed as

CARDIOSIM©cardiovascular systemcliniciane-learningheart failurelumped-parameter modelmechanical circulatory supportnumerical simulatorventilatory

Identifiers

PMID36004908

DOI10.3390/bioengineering9080383

PMCPMC9404951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.