ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Development of a New Radiation Shield for the Face and Neck of IVR Physicians.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fundamental evaluation of a novel upright shield to protect medical personnel from scattered radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a C-arm system.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Fundamental study of digital subtraction angiography using dose characteristic analysis of different protocols in lower limb arterial disease.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Evaluation of radiation protection by lead glasses for interventional radiology physicians wearing prescription glasses: considering dose reduction by prescription glasses excluding lead.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Development of a headgear-based eye protection device for physicians performing fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- The impact of the 2020 diagnostic reference level revision and the development of national regulations on occupational radiation protection in medical facilities in Japan.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Radiation Exposure to the Brains of Interventional Radiology Staff: A Phantom Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Occupational radiation exposure among medical personnel in university and general hospitals in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Effect of backscatter radiation on the occupational eye-lens dose.Journal of radiation research · 2024Article
- Eye Lens Radiation Dose to Nurses during Cardiac Interventional Radiology: An Initial Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Spatial Scattering Radiation to the Radiological Technologist during Medical Mobile Radiography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a New Real-Time Dosimeter Sensor for Interventional Radiology Staff.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Awareness of Medical Radiologic Technologists of Ionizing Radiation and Radiation Protection.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Interventional radiology (IVR) procedures are associated with increased radiation exposure and injury risk. Furthermore, radiation eye injury (i.e., cataract) in IVR staff have also been reported. It is crucial to protect the eyes of IVR physicians from X-ray radiation exposure. Many IVR physicians use protective Pb eyeglasses to reduce occupational eye exposure. However, the shielding effects of Pb eyeglasses are inadequate. We developed a novel shield for the face (including eyes) of IVR physicians. The novel shield consists of a neck and face guard (0.25 mm Pb-equivalent rubber sheet, nonlead protective sheet). The face shield is positioned on the left side of the IVR physician. We assessed the shielding effects of the novel shield using a phantom in the IVR X-ray system; a radiophotoluminescence dosimeter was used to measure the radiation exposure. In this phantom study, the effectiveness of the novel device for protecting against radiation was greater than 80% in almost all measurement situations, including in terms of eye lens exposure. A large amount of scattered radiation reaches the left side of IVR physicians. The novel radiation shield effectively protects the left side of the physician from this scattered radiation. Thus, the device can be used to protect the face and eyes of IVR physicians from occupational radiation exposure. The novel device will be useful for protecting the face (including eyes) of IVR physicians from radiation, and thus could reduce the rate of radiation injury. Based on the positive results of this phantom study, we plan to perform a clinical experiment to further test the utility of this novel radiation shield for IVR physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.