Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004779›Full record

ReviewBiophysical journal2022

The wending rhombus: Self-assembling 3D DNA crystals.

Brandon Lu, Simon Vecchioni, Yoel P Ohayon, James W Canary, Ruojie Sha

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Programming crystallization kinetics of self-assembled DNA crystals with 5-methylcytosine modification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon LuDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York.
Simon VecchioniDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York.
Yoel P OhayonDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York.
James W CanaryDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York. Electronic address: canary@nyu.edu.
Ruojie ShaDepartment of Chemistry, New York University, New York, New York. Electronic address: rs17@nyu.edu.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this perspective, we provide a summary of recent developments in self-assembling three-dimensional (3D) DNA crystals. Starting from the inception of this subfield, we describe the various advancements in structure that have led to an increase in the diversity of macromolecular crystal motifs formed through self-assembly, and we further comment on the future directions of the field, which exploit noncanonical base pairing interactions beyond Watson-Crick. We then survey the current applications of self-assembling 3D DNA crystals in reversibly active nanodevices and materials engineering and provide an outlook on the direction researchers are taking these structures. Finally, we compare 3D DNA crystals with DNA origami and suggest how these distinct subfields might work together to enhance biomolecule structure solution, nanotechnological motifs, and their applications.

Indexed as

DNANanotechnologyBase PairingNucleic Acid ConformationDNA

Identifiers

PMID36004779
PMCPMC9808540
OpenAlexW4293102533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.