Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004493›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor function and sexual function-A prospective cohort study.

Catharina Forsgren, Martina Amato, Ulrika Johannesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sexual function and pelvic floor function five years after hysterectomy.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catharina ForsgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9584-549X
Martina AmatoDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulrika JohannessonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5714-4641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHysterectomy is one of the most common major surgical procedures in women. The effects of hysterectomy on pelvic floor and sexual function are uncertain. Our objective was to investigate the effects of hysterectomy for benign indications on pelvic floor and sexual function and to compare different modes of surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a prospective clinical cohort study. In all, 260 women scheduled for hysterectomy answered validated questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Female Sexual Function Index). Participants were followed 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Data were analyzed using nonparametric statistics and mixed effect models.

resultsWomen with subtotal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and previous prolapse/incontinence surgery were excluded from further analysis, leaving the remaining cohort to 242 patients. The response rate at 6 months and 1 year follow-up was 180/242 (74.3%) and 169/242 (69.8%), respectively. There was an improvement of pelvic floor function at both follow-ups; mean score of Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire at baseline was 42.5 (51.7), at 6 months 19.9 (42.2) and at 1 year 23.7 (50.3) (p < 0.001). The mean score of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory at baseline was 69.6 (51.1), at 6 months 49 (43.2) and at 1 year 49 (43.2) (p < 0.001). There was an improvement of sexual function after 6 months (mean score of Female Sexual Function Index at baseline 17.9 [SD 11.7] and at 6 months 21.0 [SD 11.7]) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in pelvic floor or sexual function when comparing surgical techniques.

conclusionsRobotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy improve pelvic floor function to the same extent at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. There was an overall improvement of sexual function 6 months after hysterectomy, but this did not persist after 1 year.

Indexed as

Pelvic FloorPelvic Organ ProlapseCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHysterectomyProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomeabdominal hysterectomyfemale sexual functionlaparoscopic hysterectomyminimally invasive surgerypelvic floor functionrobotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID36004493
PMCPMC9812090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.