Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004409›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

The Performance of Computer-Aided Detection Digital Chest X-ray Reading Technologies for Triage of Active Tuberculosis Among Persons With a History of Previous Tuberculosis.

Mary Kagujje, Andrew D Kerkhoff, Mutinta Nteeni, Ian Dunn, Kondwelani Mateyo, Monde Muyoyeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein and Computer-Aided Analysis of Chest X-rays as Tuberculosis Triage Tests at Health Facilities in Lesotho and South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary KagujjeTuberculosis Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Andrew D KerkhoffDivision of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine Zuckerberg, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-6658
Mutinta NteeniDepartment of Radiology, Levy Mwanawasa University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Ian DunnDepartment of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kondwelani MateyoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Monde MuyoyetaTuberculosis Department, Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Funding

Feasibility and acceptability of a peer-led strategy to improve community tuberculosis case finding among non-household contacts in ZambiaK23AI157914 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KERKHOFF, ANDREW · 2021 to 2025
$999k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI157914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital chest X-ray (dCXR) computer-aided detection (CAD) technology uses lung shape and texture analysis to determine the probability of tuberculosis (TB). However, many patients with previously treated TB have sequelae, which also distort lung shape and texture. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 2 CAD systems for triage of active TB in patients with previously treated TB.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a cross-sectional active TB case finding study. Participants ≥15 years, with ≥1 current TB symptom and complete data on history of previous TB, dCXR, and TB microbiological reference (Xpert MTB/RIF) were included. dCXRs were evaluated using CAD4TB (v.7.0) and qXR (v.3.0). We determined the diagnostic accuracy of both systems, overall and stratified by history of TB, using a single threshold for each system that achieved 90% sensitivity and maximized specificity in the overall population.

resultsOf 1884 participants, 452 (24.0%) had a history of previous TB. Prevalence of microbiologically confirmed TB among those with and without history of previous TB was 12.4% and 16.9%, respectively. Using CAD4TB, sensitivity and specificity were 89.3% (95% CI: 78.1-96.0%) and 24.0% (19.9-28.5%) and 90.5% (86.1-93.3%) and 60.3% (57.4-63.0%) among those with and without previous TB, respectively. Using qXR, sensitivity and specificity were 94.6% (95% CI: 85.1-98.9%) and 22.2% (18.2-26.6%) and 89.7% (85.1-93.2%) and 61.8% (58.9-64.5%) among those with and without previous TB, respectively.

conclusionsThe performance of CAD systems as a TB triage tool is decreased among persons previously treated for TB.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosisTuberculosis, PulmonaryComputersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReadingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySputumTriageX-Rayscomputer-aided detectionCXRprior TBtriagetuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID36004409
PMCPMC9907528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.