Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004341›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2022

A comprehensive review of methods based on deep learning for diabetes-related foot ulcers.

Jianglin Zhang, Yue Qiu, Li Peng, Qiuhong Zhou, Zheng Wang, Min Qi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianglin ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, Shenzhen Peoples Hospital, The Second Clinical Medica College, Jinan University, The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yue QiuDermatology Department of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Li PengSchool of Computer Science, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, China.
Qiuhong ZhouTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zheng WangSchool of Computer Science, Hunan First Normal University, Changsha, China.
Min QiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hunan First Normal University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CNCentral South University · CNJinan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease with hyperglycemia. If not treated in time, it may lead to lower limb amputation. At the initial stage, the detection of diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) is very difficult. Deep learning has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in various fields and has been used to analyze images of DFUs. Objective: This article reviewed current applications of deep learning to the early detection of DFU to avoid limb amputation or infection. Methods: Relevant literature on deep learning models, including in the classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation for images of DFU, published during the past 10 years, were analyzed. Results: Currently, the primary uses of deep learning in early DFU detection are related to different algorithms. For classification tasks, improved classification models were all based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The model with parallel convolutional layers based on GoogLeNet and the ensemble model outperformed the other models in classification accuracy. For object detection tasks, the models were based on architectures such as faster R-CNN, You-Only-Look-Once (YOLO) v3, YOLO v5, or EfficientDet. The refinements on YOLO v3 models achieved an accuracy of 91.95% and the model with an adaptive faster R-CNN architecture achieved a mean average precision (mAP) of 91.4%, which outperformed the other models. For semantic segmentation tasks, the models were based on architectures such as fully convolutional networks (FCNs), U-Net, V-Net, or SegNet. The model with U-Net outperformed the other models with an accuracy of 94.96%. Taking segmentation tasks as an example, the models were based on architectures such as mask R-CNN. The model with mask R-CNN obtained a precision value of 0.8632 and a mAP of 0.5084. Conclusion: Although current research is promising in the ability of deep learning to improve a patient's quality of life, further research is required to better understand the mechanisms of deep learning for DFUs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerQuality of Lifeclassificationdeep learningdiabetic foot ulcermedical imageobject detectionsemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID36004341
PMCPMC9394750
OpenAlexW4290546488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.