Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004317›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Machine Learning in Infectious Disease for Risk Factor Identification and Hypothesis Generation: Proof of Concept Using Invasive Candidiasis.

Lisa M Mayer, Jeffrey R Strich, Sameer S Kadri, Michail S Lionakis, Nicholas G Evans, D Rebecca Prevots, Emily E Ricotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa M MayerOffice of Data Science and Emerging Technologies, Office of Science Management and Operations, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey R StrichCritical Care Medicine Department, NIH Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sameer S KadriCritical Care Medicine Department, NIH Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Michail S LionakisFungal Pathogenesis Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology & Microbiology (LCIM), NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas G EvansDepartment of Philosophy, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Maryland, USA.
D Rebecca PrevotsEpidemiology and Population Studies Unit, LCIM, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Emily E RicottaEpidemiology and Population Studies Unit, LCIM, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9928-8275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning (ML) models can handle large data sets without assuming underlying relationships and can be useful for evaluating disease characteristics, yet they are more commonly used for predicting individual disease risk than for identifying factors at the population level. We offer a proof of concept applying random forest (RF) algorithms to Methods: Results: Fourteen of 169 (8%) variables were consistently identified as important features in the ML models. When evaluating within-species IC, for example, invasive Conclusions: Known and novel risk factors for IC were identified using ML, demonstrating the hypothesis-generating utility of this approach for infectious disease conditions about which less is known, specifically at the species level or for rarer diseases.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebig datainfectious diseasesinvasive candidiasismachine learning

Identifiers

PMID36004317
PMCPMC9394768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.