Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004225›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2022

Comparison of performance of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves.

Hoda Hatoum, Milad Samaee, Janarthanan Sathananthan, Stephanie Sellers, Maximilian Kuetting, Scott M Lilly, Abdul R Ihdayhid, Philipp Blanke, Jonathon Leipsic, Vinod H Thourani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. From invasive gradients to pressure recovery: rethinking long-standing paradigms.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Differences in blood flow dynamics between balloon- and self-expandable valves in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hoda HatoumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Mich.
Milad SamaeeBiomedical Engineering Department, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.
Janarthanan SathananthanCenter for Cardiovascular Innovation, Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Stephanie SellersCenter for Cardiovascular Innovation, Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Maximilian KuettingNew Valve Technology, Hechingen, Germany.
Scott M LillyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Abdul R IhdayhidFiona Stanley Hospital, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Philipp BlankeDepartment of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jonathon LeipsicDepartment of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Vinod H ThouraniDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Marcus Valve Center, Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Ga.
Lakshmi Prasad DasiBiomedical Engineering Department, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Ga.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the flow dynamics of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valves pertaining to turbulence and pressure recovery. Transcatheter aortic valves are characterized by different designs that have different valve performance and outcomes. Methods: Assessment of transcatheter aortic valves was performed using self-expanding devices (26-mm Evolut [Medtronic], 23-mm Allegra [New Valve Technologies], and small Acurate neo [Boston Scientific]) and a balloon-expandable device (23-mm Sapien 3 [Edwards Lifesciences]). Particle image velocimetry assessed the flow downstream. A Millar catheter was used for pressure recovery calculation. Velocity, Reynolds shear stresses, viscous shear stress, and pressure gradients were calculated. Results: The maximal velocity at peak systole obtained with the Evolut R, Sapien 3, Acurate neo, and Allegra was 2.12 ± 0.19 m/sec, 2.41 ± 0.06 m/sec, 2.99 ± 0.10 m/sec, and 2.45 ± 0.08 m/sec, respectively ( Conclusions: Flow dynamics downstream of different transcatheter aortic valves vary significantly depending on the valve type, despite not having a general trend depending on whether or not valves are self-expanding or balloon-expandable. Deployment design did not have an influence on flow dynamics.

Indexed as

blood damagePDF, probability density functionPG, pressure gradientpressure recoveryRSS, Reynolds shear stressTAVRTAV, transcatheter aortic valveturbulenceVSS, viscous shear stress

Identifiers

PMID36004225
PMCPMC9390782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.