ArticleJTCVS open2022
Aortic root dilation in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: Does aortic root stiffness matter?
Article in JTCVS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are aortic biomechanical properties early markers of dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Aortic root (AoR) size remains an imperfect predictor of rate of aortic dilation in Marfan syndrome (MFS). Indicators of vascular phenotype such as aortic stiffness have been proposed as additional predictors. In this study we assessed the rate of AoR dilation and stiffness in adult patients with MFS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review. We included adult patients with MFS (aged 20-40 years) with at least 2 local echocardiograms 6 months apart (no aortic surgery in-between). A blinded observer analyzed the echocardiograms. AoR dilation rate and stiffness were calculated. Results: Thirty-two patients (53% women; median age, 21.1; interquartile range [IQR], 19-24 years at first echocardiogram) were included. AoR dilation rate in the entire cohort was 0 to 8 mm/year (median, 0.465; IQR, 0.23-1.45 mm/year). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that baseline AoR stiffness was associated with AoR dilation rate (β = 0.0004; Conclusions: Our results showed that AoR dilation rate varies among adult patients with MFS and is associated with baseline AoR stiffness, measured by echocardiography. Further studies are warranted to determine how aortic stiffness can be implemented clinically to refine management in patients with MFS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.