Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004043›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2022

Coronary physiology to guide treatment of coronary artery disease in a patient with severe aortic valve stenosis: friend or foe? A case report.

Lennert Minten, Keir McCutcheon, Johan Bennett, Christophe Dubois

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Letter: Coronary physiology in severe aortic stenosis: solely a matter of increased coronary resting flow?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lennert MintenDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-6320
Keir McCutcheonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-1620
Johan BennettDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-4517
Christophe DuboisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valve pathology in the developed world requiring intervention. Due to common factors in pathogenesis, patients with AS frequently have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Determining the relative contribution of each component to the disease state is not easy as there is much overlap in complaints. Moreover, severe AS interferes with the haemodynamic assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. Case summary: In this case report we describe the presentation and management of an 84-year-old patient, with a severely degenerated aortic valve bioprosthesis and an intermediate coronary artery lesion, presenting with acute decompensated heart failure and chest pain. Initial invasive haemodynamic assessment of the coronary lesion provided challenging findings and a second catheterization and intervention was needed to free the patient from his chest pain. Discussion: Optimal assessment and treatment of CAD before valve replacement are controversial. Aortic valve stenosis on itself can lead to subendocardial ischaemia with subsequent angina pectoris. Simultaneously, AS can significantly affect coronary haemodynamics, hereby interfering with intra-coronary haemodynamic assessment of co-existing coronary lesions. Currently used coronary physiological indices are not validated in the AS population and valve replacement has variable effects on the fractional flow reserve and commonly used resting indices, such as the resting full-cycle ratio. Further research on this topic is needed and an overview of currently running studies that will advance this field significantly is provided.

Indexed as

Aortic valve stenosisCase reportCoronary artery diseaseCoronary physiologyCoronary revascularizationMicrovascular functionTranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID36004043
PMCPMC9395135
OpenAlexW4292598997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.