Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36004021›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Giant Incisional Hernia Repair Using Open Intraperitoneal Dual Mesh.

Ercan Korkut, Nurhak Aksungur, Necip Altundaş, Salih Kara, Rıfat Peksöz, Gürkan Öztürk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ercan KorkutGeneral Surgery, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TUR.
Nurhak AksungurGeneral Surgery, Atatürk University Research Hospital, Erzurum, TUR.
Necip AltundaşGeneral Surgery, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TUR.
Salih KaraGeneral Surgery, Atatürk University Research Hospital, Erzurum, TUR.
Rıfat PeksözGeneral Surgery, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TUR.
Gürkan ÖztürkGeneral Surgery, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TUR.
Atatürk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim Giant incisional herniae are larger than 15 cm and are typically treated with an open approach. Our aim was to highlight the outcomes of treating giant incisional hernia using open intraperitoneal dual mesh. Methods Between January 2015 and December 2021, 25 patients with giant incisional hernias, where fascial defects were 15-30 cm, were evaluated retrospectively. Intraperitoneal dual mesh was used in all patients. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgeries, defect diameter, anesthesia method, length of hospital stay, drain application, complications, and recurrence. Results Eleven of the patients were male and 14 were female. The mean age was 62±13.5 years (29-82 years). The average BMI was 32 kg/m2 (20-52 kg/m2). The mean size of the fascial defect was 22±5.5 cm (15-30). The mean operation time was 90 minutes (70-130 minutes). Six patients had type I and II complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, specifically superficial skin infections, skin erosion, subcutaneous bleeding, and temporary ileus due to intestinal adhesion. During the average follow-up period of 36 months (6-70 months), no major complications were observed related to the recurrence and use of dual mesh. Conclusion In the treatment of giant incisional hernia, open intraperitoneal dual mesh application should be kept in mind as an effective treatment option with low complication and recurrence rates.

Indexed as

intraperitoneal dual meshopen incisional hernia repairopen intraperitoneal dual mesh placementopen onlay meshrecurrenceventral hernia

Identifiers

PMID36004021
PMCPMC9392680
OpenAlexW4286433457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.