Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003991›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022

Diversity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Mechanism in KPC2-Producing

Min Jiang, Bin Sun, Yong Huang, Chengyang Liu, Yan Wang, Yanli Ren, Yuhong Zhang, Yunying Wang, Di Mu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ceftazidime-avibactam treatment dilemma of blaAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024
    Article
  7. Evolution ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mobilization of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. A comparative study of intestinalOne health advances · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Min Jiang *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Bin Sun *Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yong HuangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Chengyang LiuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yan WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yanli RenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yuhong ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yunying WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Di MuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to understand the resistance mechanism of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) in carbapenem-resistant Patients and Methods: Four CZA-resistant Results: CZA-resistant Conclusion: In this study, although the CZA-resistant bacteria originated from only two clinical patients, four different mechanisms of CZA resistance were detected. In the in vitro induction experiment, the mechanisms of resistance to CZA in strains from different patients were also different. The above result implies that the mechanisms of resistance to CZA are generally random and diverse. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of resistance to CZA can provide a certain theoretical basis for the effective response of CZA-resistant strains and the selection of antibiotics.

Indexed as

antibiotic pressureceftazidime/avibactam-resistanceKlebsiella pneumoniaeKPC mutantsresistance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID36003991
PMCPMC9394654
OpenAlexW4292424972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.