ArticleJTCVS open2020
Next-generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Article in JTCVS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Results for Cardiovascular Xenografts Treated With Novel Anticalcification Protocols.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Durability: Focus on Structural Valve Deterioration.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Commentary: Rainmaking the "next-generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation" by anointing multidisciplinary perceptions.JTCVS open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures are increasing rapidly, but the durability of tissue valve and periprocedural complications are not satisfactory. Immune reaction to the galactose-α-1,3 galactose β-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine (α-Gal) and conventional processing protocols of cardiac xenografts lead to calcification. Next-generation TAVI needs to be made with α-Gal-free xenografts by multiple anticalcification therapies to avoid immune rejection and enhance durability, and three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to improve the procedural safety. Methods: Porcine pericardia were decellularized and immunologically modified with α-galactosidase. The pericardia were treated by space filler, crosslinked with glutaraldehyde in organic solvent, and detoxified. The sheep-specific nitinol (nickel-titanium memory alloy) wire backbone was made from a 3D-printed model for ovine aortic root. After it passed the fitting test, we manufactured a self-expandable stented valve with the porcine pericardia mounted on the customized nitinol wire-based stent. After in vitro circulation using customized silicone aortic root, we performed TAVI in 9 sheep and obtained hemodynamic, radiological, immunohistopathological, and biochemical results. Results: The valve functioned well, with excellent stent fitting and good coronary flow under in vitro circulation. Sheep were sequentially scheduled to be humanely killed until 238 days after TAVI. Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization demonstrated good hemodynamic status and function of the aortic valve. The xenografts were well preserved without α-Gal immune reaction or calcification based on the immunological, radiographic, microscopic, and biochemical examinations. Conclusions: We proved preclinical safety and efficacy for next-generation α-Gal-free TAVI with multiple anticalcification therapies and 3D-printing technology. A future clinical study is warranted based on these promising preclinical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.