Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36003761›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Double heterozygous pathogenic variants prevalence in a cohort of patients with hereditary breast cancer.

Thais Baccili Cury Megid, Mateus C Barros-Filho, Janina Pontes Pisani, Maria Isabel Achatz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reclassification of VUS inGenetics in medicine open · 2025
    Article
  6. Double Heterozygous Pathogenic Variants inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thais Baccili Cury MegidCentro de Oncologia Molecular, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mateus C Barros-FilhoCentro de Oncologia Molecular, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Janina Pontes PisaniCentro de Oncologia Molecular, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Isabel AchatzCentro de Oncologia Molecular, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary breast cancer (BC) corresponds to 5% of all BC and a larger parcel of early-onset disease. The incorporation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques reduced the cost of molecular testing and allowed the inclusion of additional cancer predisposition genes in panels that are more comprehensive. This enabled the identification of germline pathogenic variants in carriers and the introduction of risk-reducing strategies. It also resulted in the identification of the co-occurrence of more than one germline pathogenic variant in BC genes in some families. This is a rare event, and there are few reports on its impact on cancer risk. We conducted a single-institution retrospective study in which 1,156 women with early onset BC and/or a family history of cancer were tested by a germline multi-gene hereditary cancer panel. Germline pathogenic variants in high- and/or moderate-penetrance BC genes were identified in 19.5% of the individuals (n = 226). The most frequent variants were found in

Indexed as

breast cancerdouble heterozygous variantsgermline panelshereditary breast cancerNGS

Identifiers

PMID36003761
PMCPMC9393394
OpenAlexW4290546096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.