ReviewFrontiers in public health2022
Publication trends of research on COVID-19 and host immune response: A bibliometric analysis.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of traditional Chinese medicine for viral infections through immune modulation (2015-2025).Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- [Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on COVID-19 elaborated by staff of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022Pooled it
- The top 100 most cited articles on COVID-19 vaccine: a bibliometric analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Trial
- Global trends and knowledge mapping of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome research: a bibliometric analysis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- 2009-2023 Bibliometric analysis of the clinical value of graphene quantum dots in glioblastoma treatment.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Top 100 cited research on COVID-19 vaccines: A bibliometric analysis and evidence mapping.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Review
- Global trends and hotspots in the study of the effects of PM2.5 on ischemic stroke.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of the Knowledge Landscape of Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy: A Noteworthy Multidisciplinary Issue.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Hotspots and Frontiers of Host Immune Response in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Bibliometric and Scientific Visual Research from 2000 to 2022.Journal of immunology research · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Landscape and Hotspots on Dysmenorrhea: Where are We Now?Journal of pain research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As the first bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 and immune responses, this study will provide a comprehensive overview of the latest research advances. We attempt to summarize the scientific productivity and cooperation across countries and institutions using the bibliometric methodology. Meanwhile, using clustering analysis of keywords, we revealed the evolution of research hotspots and predicted future research focuses, thereby providing valuable information for the follow-up studies. Methods: We selected publications on COVID-19 and immune response using our pre-designed search strategy. Web of Science was applied to screen the eligible publications for subsequent bibliometric analyses. GraphPad Prism 8.0, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace were applied to analyze the research trends and compared the contributions of countries, authors, institutions, and journals to the global publications in this field. Results: We identified 2,200 publications on COVID-19 and immune response published between December 1, 2019, and April 25, 2022, with a total of 3,154 citations. The United States (611), China (353), and Germany (209) ranked the top three in terms of the number of publications, accounting for 53.3% of the total articles. Among the top 15 institutions publishing articles in this area, four were from France, four were from the United States, and three were from China. The journal Conclusions: The United States makes the most indispensable contribution in this field in terms of publication numbers, total citations, and H-index. Although publications from China also take the lead regarding quality and quantity, their international cooperation and preclinical research need to be further strengthened. Regarding the citation frequency and the total number of published articles, the latest research progress might be tracked in the top-ranking journals in this field. By analyzing the chronological order of the appearance of retrieved keywords, we speculated that vaccine-related research might be the novel focus in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.