ArticleJTCVS open2021
Changes in analgesic strategies for lobectomy from 2009 to 2018.
Article in JTCVS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning models for the prediction of acute postoperative pain in PACU for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Observational
- Commentary: Waves of pain.JTCVS open · 2021Article
- Commentary: Leaders float all boats higher and faster.JTCVS open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate trends in the use of epidural analgesia and nonopioid and opioid analgesics for patients undergoing lobectomy from 2009 to 2018. Methods: We queried the Premier database for adult patients undergoing open, video-assisted, and robotic-assisted lobectomy from 2009 to 2018. The outcome of interest was changes in the receipt of epidural analgesia and nonopioid and opioid analgesics as measured by charges on the day of surgery. We also evaluated postoperative daily opioid use. We used multivariable logistic and linear regression models to examine the association between the utilization of each analgesic modality and year. Results: We identified 86,308 patients undergoing lobectomy from 2009 to 2018 within the Premier database: 35,818 (41.5%) patients had open lobectomy, 35,951 (41.7%) patients had video-assisted lobectomy, and 14,539 (16.8%) patients had robotic-assisted lobectomy. For all 3 surgical cohorts, epidural analgesia use decreased, and nonopioid analgesics use increased over time, except for intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Use of patient-controlled analgesia decreased, while opioid consumption on the day of surgery increased and postoperative opioid consumption did not decrease over time. Conclusions: In this large sample of patients undergoing lobectomy, utilization of epidural analgesia declined and use of nonopioid analgesics increased. Despite these changes, opioid consumption on day of surgery increased, and there was no significant reduction in postoperative opioid consumption. Further research is warranted to examine the association of these changes with patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.